模拟Oracle行迁移和行链接

2019-03-19 14:35 by 空白葛, 阅读, 评论, 收藏, 编辑

行链接
消除方法创建大的block块
—————— 参考tom kyte的例子——————————————–
–创建4k blocksize的表空间
SQL> alter system set db_4k_cache_size=1m scope=both;

System altered.
SQL> create tablespace tbs1 datafile ‘/u01/app/oracle/oradata/test/tbs_1.dbf’ size 100m blocksize 4k;

Tablespace created.
–行链接测试
–使用定列宽的char类型来创建行链接测试表
SQL> create table row_chain_demo(
x int primary key,
a char(1000),
b char(1000),
c char(1000),
d char(1000)
) tablespace tbs1;

Table created.
–插入数据
SQL> insert into row_chain_demo(x,a,b,c,d) values(1,’a’,’b’,’c’,’d’);

1 row created.

SQL> commit;

Commit complete
–分析测试表,检查行链接
–首先建chaind_rows相关表
SQL> @?/rdbms/admin/utlchain.sql

Table created.
–分析表
SQL> analyze table row_chain_demo list chained rows into chained_rows;

Table analyzed.
–查询行链接
SQL> select * from chained_rows where table_name=’ROW_CHAIN_DEMO’;

OWNER_NAME TABLE_NAME CLUSTER_NAME PARTITION_NAME SUBPARTITION_NAME HEAD_ROWID ANALYZE_T
—————————— —————————— —————————— —————————— —————————— —————— ———
SYS ROW_CHAIN_DEMO N/A AAAFytAAGAAAAEIAAA 20-AUG-18
记录下此时的执行计划:
SQL> set autotrace traceonly statistics
SQL> set linesize 100
SQL> select /*+index(ROW_CHAIN_DEMO,x)*/* from ROW_CHAIN_DEMO where x=1;

Statistics
———————————————————-
6 recursive calls
0 db block gets
13 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
4815 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
523 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed
–找出row_chain_demo这张表所对应的数据块
SQL> select dbms_rowid.rowid_relative_fno(rowid) file#,dbms_rowid.rowid_block_number(rowid) block# from row_chain_demo;

FILE# BLOCK#
———- ———-
6 264
–dump该数据块进行分析
SQL> alter system dump datafile 6 block 264;

System altered.

–以下为trace文件的内容
data_block_dump,data header at 0x7f28ca793264
===============
tsiz: 0xf98
hsiz: 0x14
pbl: 0x7f28ca793264
76543210
flag=——–
ntab=1
nrow=1
frre=-1
fsbo=0x14
fseo=0xba1
avsp=0xb8d
tosp=0xb8d
0xe:pti[0] nrow=1 offs=0
0x12:pri[0] offs=0xba1
block_row_dump:
tab 0, row 0, @0xba1
tl: 1015 fb: –H-F lb: 0x1 cc: 2
–正常的行记录为–H-FL–,而这里为只有F(fisrt)而没有L(last),说明在这个数据块中只有行的开始,而没有行的结束,同样cc为2说明这个块中只包含了表的两个列 */
nrid: 0x01c00105.0
— nrid表示数据块的下一个指针,即其他列数据存放的数据块地址
–通过bbed分析
BBED> p kdbr
sb2 kdbr[0] @118 2977

BBED> p *kdbr[0]
rowdata[0]
———-
ub1 rowdata[0] @3077 0x28

BBED> x /rnccccccc
rowdata[0] @3077
———-
flag@3077: 0x28 (KDRHFF, KDRHFH)
lock@3078: 0x01
cols@3079: 2 –从这也可以看出数据块中只有表的两个列
nrid@3080:0x01c00105.0

col 0[2] @3086: 1
col 1[1000] @3089: a
–消除行链接
–创建blocksize为32的表空间,并将测试表移动到该表空间
SQL> alter system set db_32k_cache_size=1m scope=both;

System altered.

SQL> create tablespace tbs2 datafile ‘/u01/app/oracle/oradata/test/tbs2.dbf’ size 100m blocksize 32k;

Tablespace created.

SQL> alter table row_chain_demo move tablespace tbs2;

Table altered.
SQL> select index_name from dba_indexes where table_name=’ROW_CHAIN_DEMO’;

INDEX_NAME
——————————
SYS_C0010231
SQL> alter index SYS_C0010231 rebuild;

Index altered.
–检查行链接
SQL> delete from chained_rows;

1 row deleted.

SQL> commit;

Commit complete.
SQL> analyze table ROW_CHAIN_DEMO list chained rows into chained_rows;

Table analyzed.

SQL> select * from chained_rows where table_name=’CHAIN_ROW_DEMO’;

no rows selected
–查看消除行链接后的执行计划状态
SQL> select /*+index(ROW_CHAIN_DEMO,x)*/* from ROW_CHAIN_DEMO where x=1;

Statistics
———————————————————-
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
2 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
4668 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
512 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
1 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)http://write.blog.csdn.net/postedit/52963389
1 rows processed

–可以看出只发生了两次一致性读

行迁移
消除方法,重建数据表
–创建测试表,保证表的字段能够大于blocksize
SQL> create table row_mig_demo(
x int primary key,
a char(1000),
b char(1000),
c char(1000),
d char(1000)
) tablespace tbs1;

Table created.
–插入数据,只插入一个字段的值
SQL> insert into row_mig_demo(x) values(1);

1 row created.

SQL> commit;

Commit complete.
–分析表,查看是否有行迁移情况(此时必然没有)
SQL> analyze table row_mig_demo list chained rows into chained_rows;

Table analyzed.

SQL> select * from chained_rows where table_name=’ROW_MIG_DEMO’;

no rows selected
–查看测试表所在的数据块
SQL> select dbms_rowid.rowid_relative_fno(rowid) file#,dbms_rowid.rowid_block_number(rowid) block# from row_mig_demo;

FILE# BLOCK#
———- ———-
6 279
–dump数据块查看
SQL> alter system dump datafile 6 block 279;

System altered.
–trace文件内容
data_block_dump,data header at 0x7fa1ea9e1864
===============
tsiz: 0xf98
hsiz: 0x14
pbl: 0x7fa1ea9e1864
76543210
flag=——–
ntab=1
nrow=1
frre=-1
fsbo=0x14
fseo=0xf8c
avsp=0xf7b
tosp=0xf7b
0xe:pti[0] nrow=1 offs=0
0x12:pri[0] offs=0xf8c
block_row_dump:
tab 0, row 0, @0xf8c
tl: 6 fb: –H-FL– lb: 0x1 cc: 1 –FL:说明此时数据行的头和尾都在block内,cc:1,即只有一个字段的数据
col 0: [ 2] c1 02
end_of_block_dump
–通过bbed查看block数据层内容

BBED> p kdbr
sb2 kdbr[0] @118 3980

BBED> p *kdbr[0]
rowdata[0]
———-
ub1 rowdata[0] @4080 0x2c

BBED> x /rnccccccc
rowdata[0] @4080
———-
flag@4080: 0x2c (KDRHFL, KDRHFF, KDRHFH)
lock@4081: 0x01
cols@4082: 1

col 0[2] @4083: 1
–此时的执行计划状态
SQL> select * from ROW_MIG_DEMO where x=1;

Statistics
———————————————————-
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
2 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
639 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
512 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
1 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed
–update测试表,是表的行数据大于blocksize
SQL> update row_mig_demo set a=’a’,b=’b’,c=’c’,d=’d’ where x=1;

1 row updated.

SQL> commit;

Commit complete.
SQL> delete from chained_rows;

0 rows deleted.

SQL> commit;

Commit complete.

SQL> analyze table row_mig_demo list chained rows into chained_rows;

Table analyzed.

SQL> select * from chained_rows where table_name=’ROW_MIG_DEMO’;

OWNER_NAME TABLE_NAME
—————————— ——————————
CLUSTER_NAME PARTITION_NAME
—————————— ——————————
SUBPARTITION_NAME HEAD_ROWID ANALYZE_T
—————————— —————— ———
SYS ROW_MIG_DEMO

N/A AAAVqrAAHAAAAEVAAA 29-OCT-16
–可以看到已经产生了行迁移
–dump数据块查看
SQL> select dbms_rowid.rowid_relative_fno(rowid) file#,dbms_rowid.rowid_block_number(rowid) block# from row_mig_demo;

FILE# BLOCK#
———- ———-
6 279 –表所在数据块地址并未改变
SQL> alter system dump datafile 6 block 279;

System altered.

–trace文件内容
data_block_dump,data header at 0x7f28ca793264
===============
tsiz: 0xf98
hsiz: 0x14
pbl: 0x7f28ca793264
76543210
flag=——–
ntab=1
nrow=1
frre=-1
fsbo=0x14
fseo=0xba1
avsp=0xb8d
tosp=0xb8d
0xe:pti[0] nrow=1 offs=0
0x12:pri[0] offs=0xba1
block_row_dump:
tab 0, row 0, @0xba1
tl: 1015 fb: –H-F— lb: 0x1 cc: 2
nrid: 0x01c00105.0
col 0: [ 2] c1 02
col 1: [1000]
–bbed查看
BBED> p kdbr
sb2 kdbr[0] @118 2965

BBED> p *kdbr[0]
rowdata[0]
———-
ub1 rowdata[0] @3065 0x28

BBED> x /rnccccccc
rowdata[0] @3065
———-
flag@3065: 0x28 (KDRHFF, KDRHFH)
lock@3066: 0x02
cols@3067: 2
nrid@3068:0x01c00116.0

col 0[2] @3074: 1
col 1[1000] @3077: a
–消除行迁移
SQL> create table row_mig_demp1 as select * from row_mig_demo;

Table created

版权声明:本文为bicewow原创文章,遵循 CC 4.0 BY-SA 版权协议,转载请附上原文出处链接和本声明。
本文链接:https://www.cnblogs.com/bicewow/p/10558511.html